Party on down: why the Party Wall Act doesn’t stand up

Tony bingham 2017 bw web

The Party Wall Act is not fit for purpose, as a recent dispute between Dagenham neighbours makes only too clear

The Party Wall Act 1996 has just been given an airing. A clumsy piece of legislation; too complicated – it’s high time that parliament took it apart. Just look at what happened in this tiddler of a case between neighbours. The idea of the legislation is not really to drag the ins and outs of bashing seven bells out of a chimney breast in front of three courts and five judges. But that’s what happened in this dispute between two neighbouring households in Dagenham: Power & Kyson vs Shah [2023] EWCA Civ 239.

What is meant to happen instead is that the disputing parties bring in a building surveyor. It’s much cheaper, too. A surveyor’s award decides what’s to be done and when and what safeguards are deployed. It’s called a party wall award.

Read more …

This content is available to REGISTERED users

You are not currently logged in.

LOGIN or REGISTER to access this story

Gated access promo

LOGIN or REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts.

Take out a print and online or online only subscription and you will get immediate access to:

  • Breaking industry news as it happens
  • Expert analysis and comment from industry leaders
  • Unlimited access to all stories, including premium content
  • Full access to all our online archive

Get access to premium content subscribe today